Illustrative outline • structure only
Example pack structure
A compact, non‑enabling outline that shows what a typical submission pack + evidence pack can look like — without revealing templates, field mappings, decision logic, or portal‑specific steps.
Not a recipe
This is intentionally conceptual (categories + boundaries). Actual deliverables vary by jurisdiction, device/portfolio, and scope. Operator‑level artifacts (templates, mappings, runbooks, and acceptance tests) are shared privately under scoped agreements.
Submission pack (structure)
- Cover & scope — what’s in scope / out of scope; jurisdiction and “as applicable” boundaries.
- Roles & approvals — responsibilities and sign‑off (policy level; no workflow detail).
- Deliverables inventory — list of included artifacts (names/versions only; no filled forms).
- Change summary — what changed since the last baseline and why (high level).
- Evidence pointers — references/IDs to controlled records (no evidence content).
- References & glossary — official sources + controlled definitions used in the pack.
Evidence pack (structure)
- Evidence inventory — list of evidence items with version identifiers.
- Provenance summary — source systems and provenance notes (high level).
- Integrity artifacts — manifest + hashes (tamper‑evident; no internal checks disclosed).
- Audit narrative — “what changed / why / who approved” (human‑readable).
- Retention & access — policy‑level retention, access, and handover notes.
- Exceptions log — decisions recorded without sensitive case detail.
What we intentionally omit on public pages
- Templates, filled examples, screenshots, or field‑by‑field mappings.
- Step‑by‑step operational workflows, decision trees, or trigger thresholds.
- Tooling details, file naming conventions, or “process fingerprints”.
- Client‑identifiable numbers, timelines, or portfolio‑specific signatures.